A startling twist has occurred in the run-up to Sam Bankman-Fried’s much anticipated fraud trial. He was the former CEO of the now-closed cryptocurrency exchange FTX.
The defense team for Bankman-Fried has expressed grave reservations regarding the objectivity of the questions put to prospective jurors throughout the trial.
Mark Cohen, the attorney representing SBF, claims that the questions put forth by the US government could cause jurors to provide biased responses, which could compromise the fairness of the trial.
People who are interested in cryptocurrencies and legal professionals have paid close attention to the legal dispute surrounding Sam Bankman-Fried.
Sam Bankman-Fried is charged with fraud and using illicit methods to make money. He could face severe repercussions if convicted on these crimes.
Bankman-Fried’s acting attorney, Mark Cohen, vehemently opposed the questions the government wants potential jurors to answer in a legal filing submitted on September 29.
According to Cohen, these questions not only make it less likely for prospective jurors to disclose all pertinent facts, but they also don’t give the defense enough information to establish whether or not a jury might be biased.
Furthermore, he was concerned that the framing of these questions would lead prospective jurors to believe Bankman-Fried is guilty even before any supporting evidence has been provided.
There is a lot of interest in the trial that is set to begin on October 4. People are interested in both the potential effects on the bitcoin sector as well as the wider legal ramifications.
There will be 15 full days of trial in October and six more in November, according to a trial calendar that was published. This demonstrates the case’s complexity and importance.
More From The Kangaroo Times